SexSim Forum

Sex Sim => Suggestions => Topic started by: MCLAIN on April 01, 2011, 02:35:18 PM

Title: "Small packages"
Post by: MCLAIN on April 01, 2011, 02:35:18 PM

    I know that there are alignment problems if you make the girls shorter but what if you made a special guy that could make it line up . It could be a package deal and they would only work together and not with the other characters .This might be a way to offer a new guy and girl with some unique positions . I don't know how hard any of these ideas are to make happen . This five foot one girl made me think about this .

Title: Re: "Small packages"
Post by: Jak (ripened peach) on April 01, 2011, 02:59:37 PM

Good idea making a smaller guy to go with the package.  I'll make a note of that.

Title: Re: "Small packages"
Post by: MCLAIN on April 04, 2011, 05:56:42 PM

 I'm sorry , I said special ,not small . I was actually thinking about a larger guy to give more contrast . You would have to be  "cleaver " in finding altered stances to line them up . A small guy would take away any clue to the girls size . Small girls have shorter legs and arms and shrinking any existing girls wouldn't do it for me . I would be happy with a girl that was done right but with limited positions in the regular game .

Title: Re: "Small packages"
Post by: Jak (ripened peach) on April 04, 2011, 06:10:27 PM

Quote from: MCLAIN on April 04, 2011, 05:56:42 PM

I'm sorry , I said special ,not small . I was actually thinking about a larger guy to give more contrast . You would have to be  "cleaver " in finding altered stances to line them up . A small guy would take away any clue to the girls size . Small girls have shorter legs and arms and shrinking any existing girls wouldn't do it for me . I would be happy with a girl that was done right but with limited positions in the regular game .

Oh ok I gotcha.  Yeah something like that would require new animations to be done, whereas just having a smaller guy wouldn't.  So yes, it's still on the possibility list but it may be a while.

Title: Re: "Small packages"
Post by: smackman on April 05, 2011, 09:32:21 PM

sounds like it would basically just be a new girl with the same height guys

Title: Re: "Small packages"
Post by: MCLAIN on April 06, 2011, 02:17:35 PM

  Any doggy style or against the wall sex won't line up . Shorter legs means her knees would be off the ground .

Title: Re: "Small packages"
Post by: walo on May 19, 2011, 11:34:47 PM

A short girl would be great!  ;)
The "against the wall" problem could be solved with high heels perhaps. I see, that all the animations have to be redone to look good. Perhaps if you start with the least wastefull ones?

Title: Re: "Small packages"
Post by: Jak (ripened peach) on May 19, 2011, 11:54:01 PM

Quote from: MCLAIN on April 06, 2011, 02:17:35 PM

  Any doggy style or against the wall sex won't line up . Shorter legs means her knees would be off the ground .

Isn't that what apple crates are for?  :boxedin:

Title: Re: "Small packages"
Post by: xGx on May 20, 2011, 01:59:06 PM

I love shorter girls. Do want :)

Title: Re: "Small packages"
Post by: NCC1701 on September 22, 2011, 10:52:34 PM

I'd like a Spinner, if it could be worked out.

Title: Re: "Small packages"
Post by: CapnKlutz on November 04, 2011, 07:22:42 AM

Yes, I like the idea of petite models.

Just because they are small, doesn't mean they shouldn't be shapely.  ;)

Cap'n.  8)